Відео

is that DJI 3T ?

A compelling argument for hiring a professional firm. Well done.

Nice work! Very professional!

Hello from a fellow drone enthusiast. Facebook chose me to show your reel to. Or am I in UA-cam? 😜❤ what’s on your tripod? I think you can use a Brytee!

Are you sure you're complying with all legal aspects? the 100 mtr rule for buildngs and vehicles seem to be being breached in your video.

ua-cam.com/video/MDiPs3MvKkc/v-deo.html Check out how close this drone gets to the power lines while in Active Track. The end is the craziest part.

How’s the battery monitor? On mine it can read one or two bars, but it still be blue on the battery. I get very erroneous readings.

Drones for land survey applications ua-cam.com/video/JBFv4TUjZKk/v-deo.htmlsi=ny7gfLSV9RsMZyh4 LiDAR equipment

See our drones for land survey applications ua-cam.com/video/JBFv4TUjZKk/v-deo.htmlsi=ny7gfLSV9RsMZyh4

Hire us for LiDAR land survey work. ua-cam.com/video/JBFv4TUjZKk/v-deo.htmlsi=ny7gfLSV9RsMZyh4

Why does the emissivity indicate water penetration? Could this also just not indicate poor insulation with a sealed water tight membrane?

What software do you ponies use❔ There was an advertisement on UA-cam too with camera simulation 🖖🏻🖖🏻

So coo

15 sec?

What mapping tool is this?

I use the 350 and L2 unit also daily . Even though you can hot swap your batteries it is recommended that you do a full power down to switch your batteries. Errors can occur with the equipment so its still best practice to power down the drone on battery swaps. Keep up the content. Have a great day.

Dirt berms along the trees has a high chance of killing the trees.

Awesome stuff. We have really enjoyed our L2

Hello David, If you flew the L2 over a forested area, is it possible to be able to measure from the data the diameter of the trees at ground level?

Great video...thanks

Excellent video. I see the line of water to the street, by the wooden fence and the telephone pole is established and carries a lot of water. The first video you made about this property did not have the established line of water. Seems like you could line the bottom of the line with stones to prevent erosion and direct/contain the water as well.

The determining factor for all the choices you made was that your property has slope to begin with. Given this, you've done a beautiful job. Imagine if you had a completely flat property with zero slope. Then you might have had to use professional help, which is hard to find.

Cool video, David!

What certifications do you have to perform/analyze thermal imaging? How often do you have your thermal camera certified/calibrated? What drone licensing do you need for this?

interesting video! But the "pilot" jumpsuit is killing me!! 🤣😆 Please don't do this - it just looks silly!

This is an interesting thing. I wish I could do something simple like this to get the rain way from my yard.

Wonderful! Did you calculate the amount of runoff from your roof in a typical rain event? Perc rate of your soil? Looks like these contributed to the extensiveness of these swales, rain gardens, and spillways. Love the rocks to slow the flow of water. How about some berries in thar too? So cool beans!

"PromoSM" 😔

I am still waiting for someone to appreciate my EV business:/

I got it on sale for $1800 on a Costco exchange

I’ve seen a 2 foot D section of a Cherokee wing with drone parts stuck in the wing and a gapping hole. A Cherokee on a good day is a 130 knot aircraft depending on powerplant. Of the wing skin the D section portion of the leading edge is the strongest portion of the wing. For a drone to penetrate that like a BB gun through a soda can is alarming. Now put an all wood wing in the mix like an A model Mooney with an 140 knot cruise and it’s possibly a death of the pilot and any passengers they may have on board. I’m both a drone “ operator” and a fixed wing pilot and this scenario gives me chills.

Can you explain what you mean by drone inspections being "non evasive" do you mean "non invasive"?

as long as everyone respects airspace this should not happen

Not to mention the toxicity of those fumes

Yet another flawed experiment yields flawed results. No surprise there. Since the 2018 Gatwick hoax, the systematic crackdown on the RC hobby has been plain stupidity at its worst. Or perhaps just dumb envy at its worst: “Look! This person can independently build and fly something! How so?! I can’t do anything like that! Therefore it must be banned!” That’s the kind of “logic” we are dealing with. General aviation with its hundreds, if not low thousands od fatalities every year is in no position to lecture the zero-fatality RC hobby on safety.

Two interesting facts i discovered in my follow up investigation (refer to my videos): The police report gives a different, but precise, lat long for the collision based upon the flight log, about 800m west of the spot the TSB report states. Second, the green dot collision position in the TSB report coincides with the actual crash location on the ground, confirmed in the police report and an eye witness i talked to who saw over a dozen police vehicles invloved in the debris search. The crash was between a Montessori school and a senior's resource centre on Leslie St!

This is the exact reason why quadcopters need required RID platform rc planes don't need them. We don't fly as high as quads do. If you're in a plane, you're traveling too fast to see a quad. And it can destroy a wing.

It really sucks that a few absolute morons are causing the FAA to crack down on the RC hobby, a hobby that has been largely unregulated with no problems for the last 40 years. Now even if you build your own drone and always respect the limits given to you by a laanc app, you still have to spend 100 dollars to give away your exact position to anyone who wants it. I have to put a 19 gram 100 dollar RID chip on my 200$ 200 gram drone if I want to take pictures of a wedding. That is just stupid. Enforce RID on ready to fly drones, leave the rest of us out of it. Not to mention how vague the actual laws are. It is completely legal to mount a RID module that outputs a femtowatt of power on a mismatched antenna, as long as it is technically transmitting. FAA did nothing when given suggestions by the hobby community. Plus, if they really cared about safety, they would have us transmit something cheap, like a 900 MHz cw tone or something that could be used to identify drones from birds on radar systems near airports. Why do they need the GPS coordinates and take off coordinates? So they can prosecute someone who brought down a plane? Someone doing that intentionally is not going to have RID. A person who built there own drone is not going to be dumb enough to fly at altitude near an airport. Which leaves DJI, aka ready to fly drones. A CW tone associated with drones would be incredibly cheap and you could actually force all flight controllers to have it built in, making it almost impossible to disable. But no, make us foot the bill for this terribly written and designed legislation.

I think advance certified pilots flying for organizations like the RCMP are more likely to find themselves in a collision with a manned AC. Basic certified pilots and pilots flying recreationally have the luxury of staying away from risky areas. However, worldwide, there have been very few collisions. It is one of the safest forms of flight especially considering the number of flying hours. Of course, RPAS pilots should not fly dangerously or irresponsibly even though it is relatively safe. What is more ridiculous is TC taking the exception away from RC pilots on designated flying fields. TC actually made the airspace less safe by encouraging the dispersion of more drones in the airspace. I think this RPAS pilot was not fined very much. If it was a civilian RPAS pilot with an even less severe infraction, they would have been fined a lot more. I think he was fined as non-commercial/non-corporate entity and was only fined for one infraction which was ridiculous. The fine structure is highly punitive but the RPAS pilot seemed to suffer minimal consequences.

The test you are showing is completely bogus. It is at an air speed way beyond Vne. I would say if a drone collided like that, the pilot of the plane was doing something very wrong. What is a pilot doing well above Vne at 400' or lower?

Take our online drone safety course herewww.udemy.com/course/rpassafteyintro/?referralCode=BF77DC3867743F48FFAD

Are they able to jam drone signals around airports? Just think what the kids with their new Xmas presents could do let alone a terrorist or nutcase.

Where's part 1

FYI I am NOT a dealer!

Thanks for sharing. Remarkable that the drone didn't immediately crash.

Oh come on. You don’t need thermals to see that the roof is pooling with water in the spots you say the thermal camera is picking up emissivity 😂

Great for finding your local grow house

Thanks for sharing this, David! I like your focus on the LESSSONS LEARNT here, with the underlying theme of "let's not repeat all the mistakes made in the Buttonville case". I'll watch the rest in the series if I get a chance. (BTW, I'm not sure if you are aware but the police operation in this case was not at all the active crime scene that the TSB report implies. Instead, the ground mission was to approach a trespassing squatter who was believed to have a crossbow. No urgency. No imminent threat to citizens. No obvious reason for the altitude of the drone flight. And definitely no reason to skip ANY of the sensible drone flight preparation steps such as airspace assessment.)

Are you pleased with DroneDeploy? And have you used it for roof inspection?

Super cool indeed